The best Side of case law 395 ppc acquittal

“There isn't any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any with the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din noticed firstly the deceased and after some distance they noticed the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't necessarily mean that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. Such evidence cannot be treated as evidence of very last seen.

ninety three . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming on the main case, it is also a perfectly-recognized proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence in the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is issue for the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.

Case files can also be accessed from the public access terminals in the clerk’s office from the court where the case was filed. 

Some bodies are provided statutory powers to issue advice with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, like the Highway Code.

139 . Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Given the legal analysis on the subject issue, we have been of the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Original contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not really legally sound, Aside from promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They may be issue to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the subject post permit the case on the petitioners for promotion could possibly be thought of, however, we are very clear within our point of view that contractual service cannot be viewed as for seniority and promotion since the seniority is reckoned from the date of normal appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Conditioning, subject to availability of vacancy topic on the approval from the competent authority.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, It is additionally a perfectly-established proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence during the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is matter for the procedure provided under the relevant rules rather than otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings on the evidence.

In this case, the Supreme Court of Pakistan upheld the death penalty for the accused who intentionally murdered the victim.

The court cannot hear the transfer order challenge mainly because it falls within the terms and conditions of service. Regarding the website quo warranto writ, the petitioner must file a separate petition to challenge the private respondents' appointment orders trying to keep in view that one of many respondents has retired from service as pointed out from the counsel with the respondent university. 12. The petition and applications pending therein stand dismissed with no order as to costs. Read more

On June 16, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf of your boy by a guardian advert litem, against DCFS, the social worker, and also the therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf of the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian ad litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for the dismissal based on absolute immunity, as they were all acting in their Careers with DCFS.

All bankruptcy courts have a telephone information system, also known as the Voice Case Information System, that permits callers to acquire essential case information through a touchtone phone. This is free to make use of and out there 24 several hours per day.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

3. Rule of Regulation: The court reiterated the importance of upholding the rule of legislation and ensuring that all institutions function within their constitutional mandates.

Because of this, merely citing the case is more prone to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Think of it as calling anyone to tell them you’ve found their misplaced phone, then telling them you live in this sort of-and-these kinds of neighborhood, without actually giving them an address. Driving around the community seeking to find their phone is probably going to get more frustrating than it’s well worth.

This section specifically relates to civil servants who will be rendered surplus as a result of reorganization or abolition of a division, department, or office. Non-civil servants, by definition, will not be subject matter to the provisions from the Civil Servants Act. Their terms and conditions of service are typically governed by separate contracts or agreements with the utilizing organization. Therefore, the provisions of Section eleven-A, such as the possibility of being posted to another department, would not utilize to non-civil servants. Read more

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *